|
Written by Wild Nevada
|
|
Thursday, 16 August 2012 14:20 |
|

A new study by the Outdoor Industry Association has found that outdoor recreation economy grew during the Great Recession and accounts for more jobs than the oil and gas industry, education and construction.
The Outdoor Recreation Economy report uses these findings to make a case for developing a cleaner and more accessible system of public lands, wild and scenic waterways, hiking trails and bike paths.
"The fact that we have so much public land has created this economy, and we as public policymakers need to be here to sustain that," said Rep. Charlie Bass (R-N.H.).
Here are some of the numbers:
- 6.1 million: the number of jobs supported by spending on gear and trips.
- 646 billion: The number of dollars spent on gear and excursions.
- 5: The annual percentage rate at which the outdoor recreation economy grew between 2005 and 2011, a period of time when many industries were contracting.
Just to be clear: These numbers aren’t just generated by backpackers heading off into the wilderness. The report also includes motorized activities like off-roading, boating, motorcycle riding and RV camping. But it is significant that motorized and nonmotorized groups came together to fund and support the study.
And it’s not the first time nonmotorized and motorized enthusiasts have been like-minded about conservation issues and public land. A survey earlier this year found that a proposal to make Gold Butte a National Conservation Area with Wilderness is popular among hunters, hikers, campers, mountain bikers and off-road enthusiasts. Voters who occasionally or frequently use Nevada public lands for off-road vehicle recreation activities – typically a group that doesn’t favor wilderness proposals – were especially in favor of the Gold Butte National Conservation Area with Wilderness idea, with 73 percent saying they supported it.
Based on the eye-popping numbers in the recreation economy report, perhaps it’s no surprise that the outdoor retailers in the U.S. are prepared to use their clout to express their concerns about conservation issues. The Outdoor Industry Association recently issued an ultimatum to Utah Gov. Gary Herbert: drop your designs on Utah’s public lands or we’ll take our $40 million convention out of Salt Lake City and move to Las Vegas, Denver or somewhere else.
Herbert backed a bill that demands the federal government relinquish control of public lands in Utah by 2014. The retailers think such a move, which might be unconstitutional and hearkens back to Nevada’s old Sagebrush Rebellion days, would lead to more mining and environmental decline in Utah. Still waiting on Herbert’s response to the threat.
|
|
Written by Wild Nevada
|
|
Wednesday, 25 July 2012 13:00 |
|
The Nevada Wilderness Project supported and signed onto a letter that was just delivered to the leaders of the Senate and House of Representatives. NWP joined a number of large national conservation organizations in urging Congressional leaders to shepherd a continued commitment to the environmental review processes guided by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Passed by Congress on the first day of 1970, this Act established national policy that promoted the enhancement of the environment by establishing certain procedural requirements for all federal agencies. It requires these agencies to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to formally address the impacts or consequences of any proposed action on federal land. Examples include decisions that would result in major land alterations such as the permitting of a mine or construction of a dam; as well as small efforts such as installing a big game guzzler. Over time NEPA has been invaluable in securing healthy ecosystems for the benefit of American citizens and visitors. Many states have adopted NEPA-like legislation to address similar review for actions that are not on federal lands within their states.
However, recent attempts have been introduced into Congress that could weaken the intent of NEPA. These attempts try to amend or revoke administrative actions or legislation that had been established to protect the environment. Other attempts are aimed at reducing the amount of time necessary to conduct a thorough review – essentially diluting the process, possibly resulting in incomplete assessment of impacts.
In recent years there has been a movement to develop renewable energy projects on public lands. NWP has been a supporter of clean energy development as an action to reduce our nation’s carbon footprint and to curtail resource extractions that are destructive upon the land. Renewable energy industries have utilized government incentives to proceed in applying for rights-of-way to develop these lands and, in many cases, to build the facilities. The letter asks Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and House Speaker John Boehner and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to dissuade attempts to seek restrictions upon the public review process. Such oversight is essential to the Act by allowing scientific experts and public groups and other representatives to evaluate the consequences that proposed projects may have upon on communities and the surrounding environment.
Since its enactment, NEPA has been the method to assure these safeguards. The letter urges that the NEPA process is “understood and appreciated as a critical pathway to move renewable energy development forward.” The signing organizations point out that an effort is already under way to improve the efficiency of environmental review – one that is vetted with the group and thus earns their conservation endorsement. By bringing this to the attention of our elected leaders, the correspondence cautions against legislation that would circumvent or diminish the highly valued NEPA process.
|
|
Written by Jim Sloan
|
|
Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:31 |
Reno resident Jeneane Harter, a former chairwoman of Nevada Conservation League C-4 board of directors, has been named the new executive director of the Nevada Wilderness Project.
“We’re thrilled to be able to bring on a person of Jeneane’s caliber to lead our efforts,” said NWP board chairwoman Debra Bookout in a press release issued today. “She truly understands how the intersection of wild lands and energy development in Nevada will be a critical issue in the coming years.”
While chair of the conservation league’s board, Harter helped lead a nonprofit organization that worked with public interest groups, businesses, labor organizations, government agencies and many others to promote sensible conservation policies through education and advocacy.
Harter is also the founder and president of HiTech Communications, which since 2002 has specialized in developing and communicating clean energy policies for a variety of clients, including the U.S. Department of Energy, the Nevada State Office of Energy and several Nevada cities and counties. She’s also served as a consultant to the Nevada Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Task Force and as Wind Powering America’s Nevada representative.
Harter said she was drawn to the Nevada Wilderness Project’s “Smart from the Start” program, which advocates renewable energy projects that are sited on already-disturbed lands that have minimal value for wildlife and are near existing transmission lines. NWP launched its “smart from the start” program three years ago.
“I’ve always admired the approach NWP advocates because it mirrors my own beliefs about the right way to do renewable energy projects,” Harter said. “The Nevada Wilderness Project has worked to assemble a complex of wildlands that can one day become a mosaic of global significance. We need to protect that.”
Harter was selected to the executive director’s position after an exhaustive national search. Nevada Wilderness Project staff and its board of directors both unanimously endorsed Harter’s selection.
“Jeneane was clearly the best person for leading the Nevada Wilderness Project into the future,” said NWP Conservation Director John Tull. “She’s well-known throughout Nevada and has the respect and credibility needed to make sure we can reach our strategic goals. We’re excited to begin this new chapter at the wilderness project.”
Harter is a member of Sen. Harry Reid’s Blue Ribbon Panel on Energy, served on Gov. Jim Gibbons’ Renewable Energy Transmission Access Advisory Committee and sits on the Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership steering committee. She also has extensive executive experience in the computer industry, holding various high-level positions in public education, marketing, licensing and communications.
|
|
Friday, 01 July 2011 13:43 |
|
Kurt's Grotto - Photo by Woods Wheatcroft
Despite our current hard economic times where Nevada and many other states are suffering good things can happen. This session our legislature was able to pass SB 257 which increases penalties for graffiti at “protected sites” on public and private property. Passing overwhelmingly in both the Senate and Assembly and signed by Governor Sandoval on June 10, 2011, it is effective October 1. Senator Valerie Weiner, District 3, (Las Vegas area) was the author of this bill.
“Protected site” means: A site, landmark, monument, building or structure of historical significance pertaining to the history of the settlement of Nevada; Any Indian campgrounds, shelters, petroglyphs, pictographs and burials; or Any archeological or paleontological site, ruin, deposit, fossilized footprints and other impressions, petroglyphs and pictographs, habitation caves, rock shelters, natural caves, burial ground or sites of religious or cultural importance to an Indian Tribe (SB 257). It makes this act a felony if the building is protected. Dollar thresholds for damage for this offence dropped from $5000.00 to $500.00. Penalties can include with a 10 day mandatory jail stay with probation, restitution, up to 300 hours of community service, and substantial jail time.
This new law helps protect our state’s cultural resources on public and private property with similar protections that federal laws afforded us for resources on lands under the US government’s oversight. Similar legislation at the federal level, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act provides penalties for cultural resources over 100 years old on federal lands. Resources not meeting that age threshold are subject federal vandalism laws. Now private property rights are strengthened through enhanced legal and civil penalties. The property owner would have the option of pressing charges.
For many of us, the allure of Nevada is imbued in its rural places. Our collective history is long and rich and can be seen in its many ranches and mining sites, some long abandoned. Prehistoric rock art can also be enjoyed as art, as history or both. One cannot help to wonder about how difficult it must have been to survive especially during those below zero winters in the Great Basin or the above 100⁰ summers in the Mojave Desert. Our predecessors ranched, farmed, worked and grew families and made decisions which still influence our vision of what Nevada has been and what we will be. For a more urban view, Mid-century modern architecture can act as an anchor for revitalization based on historic preservation combined with fun and funky shops, cafes, and bars. These special places can help us understand our collective heritage.
Heritage tourism brings in outside dollars providing employment across the state. Millions of dollars annually are spent at parks, museums, hotels, restaurants, stores and casinos by visitors to our historic and scenic sites. Did you know that Nevada is home to the Great Basin National Heritage Area? If you don’t believe me, just ask them about heritage dollars in Nevada. These are example of Nevada’s special places where heritage resources deserve our patronage and protection.
Good Job Nevada!
|
|
Written by Wild Nevada
|
|
Tuesday, 14 June 2011 11:48 |
 |
 |
Gregg Tanner, Nevada Wilderness Project’s staff biologist and “rural circuit rider,” has quickly become our organization’s most in-demand camp cook. A golden-brown, roasted, whole turkey in the middle of the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge? No problem. Here’s how he does it.
My wife and I obtained the recipe for "Turkey in a Bucket" from a friend who frequently traveled to the southern U.S. on business trips. Once he was invited by his clients to accompany them on a fishing trip/outdoor cookout along the Mississippi River one summer evening. He observed first hand the process of cooking a turkey in this manner along the bank of the river. The recipe was not written down; it was simply demonstrated by his friends while enjoying some "cool ones."
The original verbal recipe called for the cooking time to be "the amount of time required to consume a twelve pack." Over the years, we experimented on our own and found that cooking time is defined as the time elapsed from lighting the briquettes until the time the bucket is removed. But a little more precisely, for a 10-pound turkey the time required is two hours 15 minutes. For a 12 to 14-pound bird, the required time is two hours and 30 minutes.
The bucket needs to be placed over the bird so as not to touch any part of the turkey, otherwise it will burn at the contact point. The "stake" should be a 24-inch concrete form stake available at a hardware or building supply store. The bucket we use was originally obtained from a pet food store. It was a pet food container. It is important that the bucket not be galvanized, otherwise it will emit toxic fumes as it heats up. I have seen old military garbage cans used that are obtained at the surplus store.
The bucket needs to just cover the bird with little room to spare. Usually the stake needs to be adjusted so it's just the right height. This is accomplished by setting the turkey on the stake vent down and propped in a secure way on a wing and then placing the bucket over the bird. If the can covers the entire bird and still comes in contact with the foil at the bottom, it is just right. Otherwise, the bird needs to be removed and the stake adjusted up or down accordingly.
Use exactly 10 pounds of briquettes; Kingsford is the brand we use. Be careful not to overcook the bird. When this happens the bird can slide down the stake and the outside often comes in contact with ashes from the briquettes. Usually the bird is salvageable if this happens, but the finished product is not going to look as good. One 12-pound bird will feed 10 to 12 adults. You'll need a pair of rubber gloves to remove the cooked bird from the stake and place it in a container where it can be carved right away. Enjoy! (vertical photos by Woods Wheatcroft; staff photo below by Tom Newcomb)
Turkey in a Bucket Ingredients:
- 12-14 pound turkey - oil - seasonings - aluminum foil - 24” concrete form stake - 10 pounds of briquettes - 5 gallon metal bucket, not galvanized 1. Wash and pat the turkey dry. Rub with oil and season inside and out. 2. Wrap the stake in foil and make a large square of foil on the ground. Pound the stake through the foil. Place the turkey on the stake, butt side down. Jab the stake into one of the turkey shoulders. 3. Place the bucket over the top. It must rest squarely on the foil square. If not, remove the turkey and pound the stake further into the ground. 4. When the bucket is in place, arrange the briquettes around the outside of the bucket. Pour on the lighter fluid and ignite. Cook until the briquettes have lost most of their heat, about 2 ½ hours. 5. Using gloves, remove the turkey from the stake to a platter. Carve and serve it up.
 |
|
|
Friday, 22 April 2011 12:20 |
|
Earth Day is a solid reminder for everyone about why we do what we do here at the Nevada Wilderness Project: work continuously to promote and protect Nevada’s most treasured places so that future generations will be able to visit and enjoy them as we do.
Renewable energy issues consume much of our focus these days at the Project, and I often get the sense that people are challenged to understand why a group called the Nevada Wilderness Project spends so much time trying to push smart from the start development of renewable energy. And the answer is simple: without a necessary and rapid transition from dirty, carbon-based fuel and energy production sources, we will have very little to try and protect a generation or two from now because global climate change will have dramatically altered the distribution, diversity, and persistence of wildlife and their habitats.
Our friends at the American Security Project have developed a state-by-state assessment of the costs of climate change. The impacts of failing to curb climate change to Nevada, alone, are quite sobering. For example, Lake Mead has a 50% chance of drying up by 2050! Of course, that will create greater demand to use water resources from remote locations in eastern Nevada and elsewhere, furthering the pressure for survival of many species. The economic reality of Lake Mead going away is estimated at over $600 million in hotel and restaurant business losses!
So how do we inhibit these effects? We work to wisely site renewable energy projects where the resources are greatest and the impacts to wildlife and exceptional landscapes are the least. This will require some sacrifices on our public lands to cover the immediate need for utility-scale, renewable energy production in the absence of an infrastructure and necessary funding base to pursue renewable energy through distributed generation, like rooftop solar. (A good comparison of utility scale and distributed generation is available from The Wilderness Society.) Our work is focused on minimizing those sacrifices, and maximizing the potential to protect our most important places in recognition of Nevada’s part in the greater goal of guaranteeing a healthy planet.
In essence, we face the greater challenge of making sure that many more Earth Day celebrations will be enjoyed by people everywhere being able to revel in the splendor of nature in the truest sense: natural places unspoiled by the actions of man. That is why a group called the Nevada Wilderness Project spends so much time on renewable energy issues and why Earth Day is so meaningful to us.
|
|
Written by Kristie Connolly
|
|
Friday, 15 April 2011 14:50 |
It’s finally here! Just in time for the sunny weather. In classic NWP style, we have the hat that you want. It comes in two styles Baseball and Corps, and three colors Blue, Brown and Black. I like my beer cold, my music loud, my state wild and my hat even cooler than my beer. You can purchase one or many on our website for $15, plus S&H. All proceeds go toward our work to protect Nevada's wild heritage.
|
|
Written by Wild Nevada
|
|
Monday, 04 April 2011 08:13 |
Happy Monday, everyone, from the Nevada Wilderness Project. In one of our last blog posts about story-telling and getting out on the land, we talked about seeing a herd of elk in Spring Valley, in Elko County, Nevada. We captured some video of them on that snowy winter day, and it's posted below. Enjoy. (And scroll down to the story just below this one to read more about the day.)
|
|
Written by Wild Nevada
|
|
Tuesday, 22 March 2011 12:42 |

John was fiddling with his iPod, looking for the perfect road trip mix. A Nevada atlas lay on the seat between us, open to a well-worn page showing Highway 50 east of Ely. Our destination was Spring Valley, and we were traveling there in a bright red, two-door pick-up truck. It was a cold December day, and we drove past big rounded clumps of snow-covered sagebrush for miles and miles. Like a landscape-sized marshmallow crispy treat.
How do little animals like mice and pygmy rabbits survive out there in all that snow? John went into a monologue about the sagebrush canopy, a network of tunnels, and this “subnivian” world that shelters them from brutal weather and prey. Subnivian. Great word.
Cresting Connors Pass just before Spring Valley, we pulled to the side of the road and took a long look. A crisp winter sun was setting behind us, the valley sparkled below, and a huge cluster of snowy clouds hung near the foothills of giant Wheeler Peak. Magnificent.
We drove down the hill and up a side road, plowing through a foot of new snow and wondering if we would find a place to turn around. Just then, as the snow began to fall, we saw them. It was a herd of elk, probably 80 or more, pushing their way through the deep snow looking for grass to feed on and pausing near stands of sagebrush to take shelter from the strong winds.
They were huge – and there were so many. Using binoculars and a video camera, we watched the herd for a long time. Snow fell on their backs, and they moved quietly. I stood there looking through the camera lens, and a female with a trailing calf caught my eye. I watched her drop her head, eat a tuft of something, then rise up with a little heap of snow piled on her long snout. It was at once beautiful and funny, and I found myself wanting to reach across the valley and dust the snow off her nose.
I can hardly recall our other reasons for making that trip. Watching the elk is what I remember most about the day. That, and telling my friends when I got back home about seeing a little pile of snow on an elk’s nose. For all of us at NWP, telling stories about our experiences with nature is what keeps us going. And we know that is true for many of you. Camping in the wild, walking in a city green space, paddling a river… and then telling people about it. Telling stories makes life rich. So I offer you our elk story with the intention of inspiring you to tell stories of your own.
And of course, I offer our story and this letter to ask you to please make a contribution to the Nevada Wilderness Project. We count on your support, and we need it to make sure our organization’s conservation stories get out to the world and influence policy-makers.
|
|
Written by Wild Nevada
|
|
Monday, 24 January 2011 11:35 |
In our culture we rely on statistics to make our arguments, to amuse our friends and impress strangers, and to prove success. In the non-profit world there is a metric we measure ourselves by to determine whether we have put funds we have received to good use. In our case, the 8% for Administration, 17% for Fundraising and 75% for Program work by most standards would be considered money well spent. There are no legal requirements for meeting these percentages and when I looked it up, the answers varied widely as to what is considered “good.” Most answers include something along the lines of "it depends on the organization and what they do."
Like many things today, when we are easily swayed by quick and simple statements (or in this case statistics) without looking closer or asking the right questions, we may miss the point. And even though these numbers seem impressive at first glance, the real question is whether or not NWP is fulfilling its mission effectively. If you consider some of our 2010 accomplishments at the Project . . .
- Spear-heading a "smart from the start" approach to renewable energy development in Nevada.
- Hiring a Renewable Energy Coordinator to focus on the intersection of renewable energy development and habitat conservation.
- Writing solar royalty legislation to bring conservation funding back to Nevada.
- In-depth assessment of the Southwest Intertie Project (SWIP) Transmission Line (and negotiating a re-route of the line to better avoid sage grouse leks).
- Appearing in a documentary about the SWIP that will air on PBS and at the Wild & Scenic Film Festival.
- Participating in dozens of conservation planning and strategy conferences throughout the West.
- Participating with the Western Governors’ Association on habitat connectivity planning.
- Campaigning for Gold Butte and other special landscapes around the state
. . . then the answer is a resounding yes! And none of this work would have been possible without your support, engagement and financial contributions. Thank you.
Denise Barclay, NWP's Director of Administration
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |
|
|